Unlike conventional parsers, the Enju parser can output predicate argument structures in addition to parse trees.
By running Enju without any command-line arguments, the parser outputs only predicate-argument relations. They look similar to labeled dependency structures, and are easy to use. Actual examples of predicate argument structures are shown below. Each line in the output represents a predicate-argument relation between two words. For instance, the second line in the first example indicates that there is an "ARG1 (logical subject)" relation between the predicate "run" and the argument "he". Note that the same semantic relations holding among the three words, "he", "run", and "company", are obtained from sentences written in different syntactic structures.
ROOT | ROOT | ROOT | ROOT | -1 | ROOT | ROOT | runs | run | VBZ | VB | 1 |
runs | run | VBZ | VB | 1 | verb_arg12 | ARG1 | He | he | PRP | PRP | 0 |
runs | run | VBZ | VB | 1 | verb_arg12 | ARG2 | company | company | NN | NN | 3 |
the | the | DT | DT | 2 | det_arg1 | ARG1 | company | company | NN | NN | 3 |
ROOT | ROOT | ROOT | ROOT | -1 | ROOT | ROOT | is | be | VBZ | VB | 5 |
is | be | VBZ | VB | 5 | verb_arg12 | ARG1 | company | company | NN | NN | 1 |
is | be | VBZ | VB | 5 | verb_arg12 | ARG2 | small | small | JJ | JJ | 6 |
small | small | JJ | JJ | 6 | adj_arg1 | ARG1 | company | company | NN | NN | 1 |
The | the | DT | DT | 0 | det_arg1 | ARG1 | company | company | NN | NN | 1 |
that | that | IN | IN | 2 | relative_arg1 | ARG1 | company | company | NN | NN | 1 |
runs | run | VBZ | VB | 4 | verb_arg12 | ARG1 | he | he | PRP | PRP | 3 |
runs | run | VBZ | VB | 4 | verb_arg12 | ARG2 | company | company | NN | NN | 1 |