plan: information that can be realized as a process

Scope

References to methods, algorithms, experimental designs, data format specifications, programming languages, software, informal sequences of instructions, and similar information entities that can be realized as processes are annotated as plan, including collections and universals of such entities.

Syntactic constraints

Names and nominal mentions (see Span annotation: Name mention annotation and Nominal mention annotation)

Examples

Further details

In text, there is often ambiguity between methods (and similar) conceived of in the abstract, described in natural language, presented in (pseudo)code on paper, implemented in a programming language in a computer, compiled into machine code, etc. plan annotation does not require this ambiguity to be resolved: statements such as [our] method are annotated as plan regardless of which of the above they refer to.

Note: mentions of metrics (e.g. TFIDF) are annotated as plan when understood as referring to methods for calculating a value, and as data-item when understood as referring to those values themselves (see Specific annotation guidelines: DATA-ITEM vs. PLAN).

References

The semantic scope of plan annotation matches that of directive information entityIAO: “An information content entity whose concretizations indicate to their bearer how to realize them in a process.” [2] (see Ontological basis: Information entities). Contrast process and data-item, consider plan-or-process for ambiguous cases.